Selected Topics


Source Attribution of Windblown Dust: Impact on Air Quality

 

  •  Joshi, J.R., 2021. Quantifying the impact of cropland wind erosion on air quality: A high-resolution modeling case study of an Arizona dust storm. Atmospheric Environment, 263, 118658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118658   (dust from farmland/agricultural land)

     

    Impact: notably cited in 2025 World Meteorological Organization report, as a source of motivation in studies focusing on building practical solutions for farmland wind erosion (A, B), and many others.    

Model Improvement 
Model Implementations and Intercomparison: NASA GEOS
  • Joshi, J.R., da Silva, A., Colarco, P., Darmenov, A., Ginoux, P., Kok, J., Collow, A. and Nowottnick, E., 2025. Evaluating and Comparing Dust Emission Schemes within the NASA GEOS Model. American Met Society (AMS) 2025 (NOLA) Click for slides from NASA site 
Predictability: Short-range 
  • Joshi, J. and Shukla, J., 2023. “Butterfly Effect” for dust storms. AGU Fall Meeting 2023.
 Predictability: Seasonal
  •  Joshi, J., Shukla, J., Ginoux, P., Pu, B., da Silva, A.M., and Delworth, T.L., 2022. AMS 2022.
    Seasonal Variability & Predictability of Atmospheric Dustiness over the Western US [physics-informed statistical modeling]

Modeling and Predictability of Dust Storms and Atmospheric Dustiness Over the Western United States

  •  Joshi, J., 2023 |Summary here 
    Could be useful for literature review on dust, meteorology, and predictability. Please cite if you find the information useful (in papers or public reports).  Cite as:

    Joshi, J.R., 2023. Modeling and Predictability of Dust Storms and Atmospheric Dustiness

    Over the Western United States (Ph.D. thesis). George Mason University, ISBN 9798379706241, Publicatin No. 30425455. 

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0839-9007

A Note: There is high value in critically reviewing past literature, as it shapes present and future research directions. While scientific progress inevitably reflects the theoretical and technical limitations and priorities of its time—and therefore includes shortcomings—we must nonetheless acknowledge these constraints and invest some time to examine the existing literature to identify its strengths as well as weaknesses. 

In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.
Galileo Galilei